Discussion about this post

User's avatar
bill steigerwald's avatar

No one, including me, denies the climate is changing. It is always changing and it's gotten a lot hotter and colder on Earth many many times throughout the eons. I don't deny that it's getting hotter, either, though the data is so fuzzy and scant and the climate is so dynamic and complex, it's impossible to accurately take the Earth's exact 'average' temperature. The issue is how much is the Earth heating from human activity, how serious a danger it is, what we can do about it realistically and what is the cost of trying to stop or reverse the human-caused warming by switching to alternative energy sources, etc. -- and is it worth it. I'll go with Bjorn Lomborg's reasonable position. https://clips.substack.com/p/q-and-a-bjorn-lomborg-the-smart-still?r=5mhtq&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web For 20 years he has been arguing that climate change is happening but it is not an existential threat -- or a preventable one. He says the trillions we Westerners in the USA and Europe spend trying to reverse or slow the amount of CO2 in the air (while China and India open up coal-fired power plants every 10 minutes) is a terrible waste. The money could be better spent on helping the billions of humans in the poorest countries get more water wells, medicine, food and modern infrastructure.

Karen  Mouradjian, JD's avatar

That's enough for me to unsubscribe climate change deniers

No posts

Ready for more?