Public Choice explains why politics is so awful
Public Choice' is a school of thought that 'has revolutionized the study of democratic decision-making processes.'
Anyone who pays close attention to the vile doings of the people in charge in Washington or in local places of power should know what 'Public Choice' is and how that school of economic thought has revolutionized the study of democratic decision-making processes.' ... Here's a link and a sample quote:
The Lessons of Public Choice
One key conclusion of public choice is that changing the identities of the people who hold public office will not produce major changes in policy outcomes. Electing better people will not, by itself, lead to much better government. Adopting the assumption that all individuals, be they voters, politicians, or bureaucrats, are motivated more by self-interest than by public interest evokes a Madisonian perspective on the problems of democratic governance. Like that founding father of the American constitutional republic, public choice recognizes that men are not angels and focuses on the importance of the institutional rules under which people pursue their own objectives. “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself” (Federalist, no. 51).